Soup McGee
Prof. Cool
M/W 10:30
2/4/2014
What
does Ferber mean when she writes that “the history of racial categorization is
intertwined with the history of racism?”
From
the time of Linnaeus categorizing all living things by his biblical, mono-genetical
world view so that some things are superior and some things are inferior,
simply by the nature of their creation—until today, where that idea of race
(the falsity of race, more accurately) is used consistently as both a political
and social wedge, the categorization of people by ‘race’ has been used to
create a collective disdain for the ‘other’ borne from not knowing, misunderstanding
and fear…enforced and encouraged through law or social hierarchy. One example
is noted xenophobe Charles Murray and his ‘Bell Curve” (1994), which used
flawed science to make a case that “non-whites’ had lower IQ, because, you
know…
Buffon
too, was a mono-geneticist, and created the popular notion of race as if white
were the true color of humanity, and from his findings we created a world where
the less white one was, the less favored by the law they would be. His ‘five
races’ theory greased the skids for further abuse of non( very
particular)-Whites under the guise of religious supremacy, and the practice of
unquestionable doctrine.
I
find it incredibly important to mention that the Bible says not one word about
how HORRIBLE slavery is, but there are numerous verses about how to treat
slaves and how slaves should be obedient. The history of categorization is
intertwined with the Biblical narrative, which is knotted firmly to the history
of racism.
The
author makes the cogent point that ‘racist beliefs have been built upon’ flawed
science and the linking of certain physical or cultural traits to ‘supposed
genetic differences.” I not only agree with this and the other concepts put
forth, I learned something (Linnaeus, Buffon, Blumenbach). In reflection, I was
flabbergasted to hear group-mates in the class discussion insist that the Bible
is a literal, inerrant document (in not so many words), and not make the
connection between being scientifically classified as a sub-human, and that
this science was used to justify the Biblical story ( a priori assumption), which has been and is still used to classify
people as ‘worthy’ or, oh, I dunno, ‘evil’.
This may have been a
slightly dense article, but it was not outside my wheelhouse; I enjoy the
digging. It makes perfect sense to me that the vestiges of a white-supremacist,
Christian-centric nation can be found where one goes looking for them. But this
is true for things that are not true, which is why just looking for something
is not enough. Ferber nails it by saying that “accounts that label the
contemporary white supremacist movement as fringe and extremist often has the
consequence of rendering this history invisible.” In my studies of Political
Science, I have focused on the Christian Right and their rise to power through
the Tea Party, but these studies have led me backwards to the Dominionist
Rousas John Rushdoony, influential
conservative Paul Weyrich, Christian Revisionist ‘scholar’ David Barton and
many more ideologically-related individuals who profit from their white
privilege and the biblical story that entrenched it.
My
fear is not that people will believe what they believe. That’s fine. But when
your biblical beliefs get mixed up in science and law and the everyday social
life of one who has made the choice to NOT believe, what I am feeling is that
same sort of oppression that ‘non-whites’ have long experienced under
Biblically-inspired laws. Take the three men I mentioned above as examples…
Rushdoony believed Deuteronomy and Leviticus should replace the Constitution,
Weyrich created the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) of Voter ID
and Stand Your Ground fame, and David Barton, as a former head of the Texas GOP
and a member of both the California and Texas School Boards for more than
twenty years, bent the ear of publishers to slowly create a new generation of
kids who truly BELIEVE that America is a Christian Nation meant to be occupied
by Christians, ruled by God’s law…that democracy is of the devil, as is
evolution and the mere acknowledgement of global warming….the minimum wage, any
but the first ten ‘ordained and inspired’ amendments…
disappointed I was in the lack of awareness, even an acquaintance
with the facts re: the Bible and the long history of it being used to
justify atrocious and ghastly acts, from my classmates, given that
this WAS the assigned reading.
(Planting The Seed: The Invention of Race....Abby L. Ferber)
http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780495504344
No comments:
Post a Comment